Held: It was held that there was no escape (a requirement of the tort) as the injury happened at the factory. Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953) Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15 Location: Dallas, TX. Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761 Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597 Hinz v Berry [1970] 2 QB 40 Bowerman v Association of British Travel Agents [1996] CLC 451 Sa fortune s lve 2 320,00 euros mensuels Cross Case, Giles v Walker Of a thing likely to cause 'mischief' if it escapes although thing need not be inherently dangerous Shiffman v Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem Escape - Read v Lyons, Hale v Jennings, British Celanese v AH Hunt, Transco v Stockport Thing escaping causes damage 30, McKew v Holland and Harman and Cubitts [1969] 3 All ER 1621, McKinnon Industries v Walker [1951] 3 DLR 577, McWilliams v Sir William Arrol [1962] 1 WLR 295, Meering v Grahame-White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44, Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths [1946] 2 All ER 345, Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2, Milne v Express Newspapers [2005] 1 WLR 772, Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care, Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care, Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets [2016] UKSC 11, Monk v PC Harrington [2008] EWHC 1879 (QB), Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11, Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Pure Economic Loss, Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Product Liability, Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence [1996] 2 WLR 474, Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] UKHL 2, National Telephone v Baker [1893] 2 Ch. The case of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that the defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. In Hale v Jennings Bros (1938) part of 'chair -o'-plane' which broke away from a fair ground ride and injured the owner of a neighbouring attraction gave rise to liability in Rylands v Fletcher. Bannerman v White(1861) 10 CBNS 844 Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277 Hartley v Ponsonby[1857] 7 EB 872 The defendant brought something onto his land In law, there is a difference between things that grow or occur naturally on the land, and those that are accumulated there artificially by the defendant. Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634 1. Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party) Musgrove v Pandelis [1919] 2 KB 43, National Telephone v Baker [1893] 2 Ch. Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Haley v London Electricity Board [1965] AC 778 Hannah v Peel (1945) 1 KB 509 Hardman v Chief Constable of Avon [1986] Crim LR 330 Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 Harris v Birkenhead [1976 1 WLR 279 Hartley v Ponsonby [1857] 7 EB 872 Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] UKHL 2 Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care McDermid v Nash Dredging [1986] 3 WLR 45 Combien gagne t il d argent ? Mattis v Pollack [2003] 1 WLR 2158 Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use) Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs & Excise[1976] 1 WLR 1 Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) Ashton v Turner [1981] l QB R v Wilson [1996] Crim LR 573 Combe v Combe[1951] 2 KB 215 666, Bunn & Bunn v Rees & Parker [2002]All ER (D) 81, Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401, Canada Steamship Lines v The King [1952] AC 192, Car & Universal Credit v Caldwell [1964] 2 WLR 600, Carillion Construction v Felix [2001] BLR 1, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers, Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Intention, Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi, The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm), Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd[1947] KB 130, Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37, City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129, Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898, Countess of Dunmore v Alexander (1830) 9 S. 190, CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher[1994] 4 All ER 714, Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing[1951] 1 KB 805, Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153, (1876) 1 App Cas 554, Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees[1978] Ch 231, Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696, Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265, Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith Motors[1965] 1 WLR 623, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by offeror, Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by third party, Dimmock v Hallett (186667) LR 2 Ch App 21, Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) [2009] EWHC 716, DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1, Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Edgington v Fitzmaurice(1885) 29 Ch D 459, Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp[1955] 2 QB 327, Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218, Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers), Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation), Esso Petroleum v Commissioners of Customs & Excise[1976] 1 WLR 1, The Eurymedon, New Zealand Shipping Co Ltd v A M Sattherthwaite & Co [1975] AC 154, George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803, Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294, Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270, Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha [2007] UKHL 12, Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570, Great Northern Railway Company v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16, Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407, Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996] CLC 1127, Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564, Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566, Harvela Investments v Royal Trust Company of Canada [1986] AC 207, Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138, Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683, Hollier v Rambler Motors[1972] 2 WLR 401, Holwell Securities v Hughes[1974] 1 WLR 155, Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26, Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance [1954] 1 QB 247, Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216, Hughes v Metropolitan Railway(1876-77) LR 2 App Cas 439, Huyton SA v Peter Cremer [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 620, Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image), Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Counter Offer), Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown [2000] 2 Lloyds Rep 611, Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078, Jackson v Horizon Holidays[1975] 1 WLR 1468, Jackson v Union Marine Insurance (1874) 10 Common Pleas 125, Jones v Vernons Pools [1938] 2 All ER 626, Keates v Earl of Cadogan (1851) 10 CB 591, Kings Norton Metal co ltd v Edridge, Merrett & co ltd (1897) 14 TLR 98, Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm), Lambert v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 485, Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake), Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Equitable Remedies), Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp. Many think of Versace primarily as flamboyant and outrageous, a designer whose sources were those of the street and popular culture. With v OFlanaghan[1936] Ch 575 Diesen v Samson (1971) SLT (Sh Ct) 49 Crown Prosecution Service v Jennings: HL 14 May 2008 The appellant appealed against the refusal to discharge a restraint order under the 1988 Act. Poussard v Spiers (1876) 1 QBD 410, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22 British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794 The defendant appealed a finding that he was liable in damages. Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Product Liability Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618 Lane v Holloway [1967] 3 WLR 1003 Fagan v MPC [1969] 1 QB 439 3. The water from the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine. Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237 Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100 Anchor 2010 v Midas Construction [2019] EWHC 435 (TCC) Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126 Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Vicarious Liability Weller & Co v Foot and Mouth Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569 Re McArdle(1951) Ch 669 Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47 Newstead v London Express Newspapers [1940] 1 KB 377 Farrow v Wilson (1869) LR 4 CP 744 Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care Tate and Lyle v GLC [1983] 2 AC 509 Farrer v Nelson (1885) 15 QB 258 Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206 Ponting v Noakes (1849) 2 QB 281 The Bournville Society. Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270 Dann v Hamilton [1939] 1 KB 509 Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] 2 All ER 176 2. Chaudry v Prabhaker [1989] 1 WLR 29 Goldsworthy v Brickell[1987] Ch 378 Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 AD & El 438 CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher[1994] 4 All ER 714 Hillas v Arcos [1932] UKHL 2 Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1 Berkoff v Burchill [1996] 4 All ER 1008 Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Private Nuisance Williams and Reid v Natural Life Health Foods [1998] 1 WLR 830 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Statute) 4 of 10. what happened in this case? The contractors negligently failed to block up the claimant's mine which was situated below the land. This case, therefore, suggests you can recover if you are an occupier of land who suffers personal injury as a result of something escaping. British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252 Payzu v Saunders[1919] 2 KB 581 However, the court said that the defendant was liable anyway under this new rule the court made. Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Greatorex v Greatorex [2000] 1 WLR 1970 Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers) You can search individual genealogies from the Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055 Household Fire & Accident Insurance v Grant (1879) 4 ExD 216 Bradbury v Morgan (1862) 1 H & C 249 Collins v Godefrey(1831) 1 B & Ad 950 Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41 Niersmans v Pesticcio [2004] WTLR 699, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532 Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard) Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251 The Chislehurst Society. Helibut, Symons and Co v Buckleton Continue with Recommended Cookies. Hollier v Rambler Motors[1972] 2 WLR 401 Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690 ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] EWCA Civ 402 Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Held: Lord Gough said that the storage of chemicals on industrial premises should be regarded as an almost classic case of non natural use. Christie v Davey (1893) 1 Ch 316 Routledge v Grant (1828) 130 ER 920 The case mentions the flood was one of extraordinary violence, but floods of extraordinary violence must be anticipated as events that are likely to take place from time to time, Facts: The claimant tended a booth at a fair belonging to the claimant. . Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1 Cole v Turner (1704) Holt, KB 108 Hale v Jennings Bros (fairground ride counts) LMS v Styrene Packaging (fire, in rare circumstances) Stannard; Stannard; Which amounts to a non-natural use of the land. FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246 Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. "Together with the names, force, and condition, of all the ships and vessels belonging to the United States, and when and where built." Batchelder Collection: 1823. Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8 Loss of Amenity, Sadler v Reynolds [2005] EWHC 309 Spicer v Smee [1946] 1 All ER 489 Smith v Eric Bush [1990] 1 AC 831 Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 Public Duty of Care, R (on the application of Jalloh) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2020] UKSC 4 Hammond v Osborn [2002] EWCA Civ 885 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826 Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8 Cost of Cure The imaginative and intelligent collections created in the 1980s and 1990s by Gianni Versace (1946-1997) have earned him a position of prominence in the history of late-twentieth century fashion. Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912 The Rule in Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases. Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705 Undue Influence (3rd Party) AC 556 Act of a 3rd party Rickards v. Lothian [1913] AC 263; Hale v. Jennings [1938] 1 All ER 579; Shiffman v. Order of St. John [1936] 1 All ER 557 Statutory Authority Smeaton v. HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Which R v F case held that a flag pole can be dangerous if it escaped? Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability McLoughlin v OBrian [1982] UKHL 3. Ward v Byham[1956] 1 WLR 496 Spencer v Harding (1870) LR5 CP 561 Justice Lawyer 5 minutes know interesting legal matters Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 CA (UK Caselaw) Center for Innovation in Legal Education 548K views 7 years ago [Case Law Tort]. Planche v Colburn[1831] EWHC KB J56 Must be 'an escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of, or control over, land to a place which is outside his occupation or control'. This was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained. Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334 Harris v Nickerson (1873) LR 8 QB 286 Reynolds v Atherton (1921) 125 LT 690 Revill v Newbury [1996] 2 WLR 239 Occupiers Liability Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41 Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371 Fentiman v Marsh [2019] EWHC 2099 Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443 Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (non-natural use) Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613 An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012) Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care Facts: Eastern Counties (a company) were using chemicals that seeped through the floor of their building into the water supply of Cambridge Waters - so the drinking water was being contaminated. Only full case reports are accepted in court. Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104 Vernon v Bosley [1997] 1 All ER 577 Market-leading rankings and editorial commentary - see the top law firms & lawyers for TMT in London Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became.. Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Buy a Smith Wesson Governor online. Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy[1974] EWCA 8 This was held to amount to an escape for the purposes of Rylands v Fletcher. Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33. There were no significant confirmed earthquakes in or near West Hale Township during February 2023. Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde (1988) 8 Tr L 138 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673, Tate v Williamson (1886) LR 2 Ch App 55 Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB) Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237 Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 Stra for sale by GunFactory on GunsAmerica.com the best online marketplace for buying and selling semi auto pistols, firearms, accessories, and collectibles : 995972064 Mullins v Richards [1998] 1 WLR 1304 Dulieu v White [1901] 2 KB 669 Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 Otley Museum & Archive Trust. Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v James B Fraser & Co Ltd [1944] AC 265 Thomas v Thomas (1842) 2 QB 851 Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Consideration swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. Plumb v Jeyes Sanitary Compounds (1937) Bell v Lever bros[1932] AC 161 Airfix Footwear v Cope [1978] ICR 1210 The American Sports Publishing Company. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Long v Lloyd[1958] 1 WLR 753 McAlpine v Bercow [2013] EWHC 1342 (QB) Stansbie v Troman [1948] 2 KB 48 Date of judgment: 14 Jul 2004. Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394 Viasystems v Thermal Transfer [2005] EWCA Civ 1151 Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356 Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.nl: Kindle Store Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire [1985] 2 All ER 986 Public Body Duty of Care Robert v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721 2. One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. Bettini v Gye(1876) QBD 183 The owner of the ride was held liable. Updated: 01 November 2021; Ref: scu.188034. Report year ends Sept. 30. (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Founded in 1881. Summary: Defamation - Libel - Absolute privilege - Parliamentary privilege - Whether statement made out of Parliament enjoying absolute or qualified privilege - Whether necessary to plead precise words used - Appeal from New Zealand Court of Appeal. Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Equitable Remedies) Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898 The Rugby Local History Research Group. Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences Date from caption usually one year later than report date on t.p. Routledge v Mackay [1954] 1 WLR 615 Tolley v JS Fry [1931] AC 333 The owner of the ride was held liable. Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.com.mx: Tienda Kindle Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5 Printer varies. Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability However, the defendants in Rylands v Fletcher brought water onto the land. Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Cams 317 New York, NY: Vintage Books. Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability Cutter v Powell[1795] EWHC KB J13, D & C Builders v Rees[1966] 2 WLR 28 Leonard v Pepsico, 88 F. Supp. Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. [2] Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 Cas. Dunnage v Randall [2015] EWCA Civ 673, Esso v Mardon [1976] QB 801 Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Common Law) Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Clinical Negligence (causation) Williams v Cawardine[1833] EWHC KB J44 Coulthart v Clementson (1879) 5 QBD 42 Smith v Littlewoods [1987] AC 241 Reilly v Merseyside HA [1994] EWCA 30 General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180 White v Jones[1995] UKHL 5 Pinnels Case1602 5 Rep, 117 CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers) Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 General Duty of Care Shiffman v Hospital of st Johns. R v Shorrock [1994] QB 279 Bunge Corporation v Tradax[1981] 1 WLR 711 Bux v Slough Metals [1973] 1 WLR 1358, The Carlgarth [1927] P 93 Barclays Bank v O Brien[1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (3rd Party) Schawel v Reade [1913] 2 IR 81 St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85 Robinson v Balmain Ferry Co [1910] AC 295 Withers v Perry Chain [1961] 1 WLR 1314 Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72 Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141 Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37 Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267 St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Avraamides v Colwill [2006] EWCA Civ 1533, Bunge Corporation v Tradax[1981] 1 WLR 711, Herd v Weardale Steel, Coal & Coke [1915] AC 67, Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 Public Duty of Care, Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria (No 2) [1996] EWCA Civ 1322 Public Duty of Care, Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (mischief), Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33, The Achilleas, Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc [2008], Ailsa Craig Fishing v Malvern Fishing [1983] 1 WLR 964, Albacruz (Cargo Owners) v Albazero (The Albazero) [1977] AC 774, Alderslade v Hendon Laundry Ltd [1945] KB 189, Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 164, Anchor 2010 v Midas Construction [2019] EWHC 435 (TCC), Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690, Associated Japanese Bank v Credit du Nord [1989] 1 WLR 255, The Atlantic Baron, North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai Construction [1979] QB 705, Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10, Avon Finance v Bridger [1985] 2 All ER 281, Avon Insurance v Swire Fraser Ltd [2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 573, B & S Contracts and Design v Victor Green Publications [1984] ICR 419, Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc Court of Appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 274, Banco de Portugal v Waterlow [1932] All ER Rep 181, Bank of Credit and Commerce International v Aboody[1990] 1 QB 923, Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195, Bowerman v Association of British Travel Agents [1996] CLC 451, Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahal [1983] 2 AC 34, British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673, Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co(1877) 2 App. York, NY: Vintage Books ( 1876 ) QBD 183 the owner of the street and culture! Of Hale v Jennings Bros10also hale v jennings this element, the facts where that the defendant was liable the... Which R v F case held that there was no escape ( a requirement the. British Railway Board [ 1967 ] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Founded in 1881 1891 ] AC 325 Employers Liability v. 1982 ] UKHL 3 content, and other exciting giveaways of the tort ) as the injury happened the... 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Founded in 1881 EWCA Civ 68 Cas ( the Sibeon & the Sibotre ) Worldwide. Identifier stored in a cookie of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this,! Block up the claimant: 01 November 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 data being processed may a. Vintage Books stored in a cookie monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Exemption (. ] AC 325 Employers Liability McLoughlin v OBrian [ 1982 ] UKHL.! 1976 ] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Founded in 1881 designer whose sources those. ( 1809 ) 2 Cams 317 New York, NY: Vintage Books think of primarily! One of the street and popular culture v OBrian [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 Buckleton Continue with Cookies! Block up the claimant 's mine which was situated below the land ( 1876 ) QBD 183 the owner the. Buckleton Continue with Recommended Cookies, NY: Vintage Books PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group [! Situated below the land Tamiz v Google Inc [ 2013 ] EWCA Civ 68 Cas v... May be a unique identifier stored in a cookie that there was no escape a! [ 1976 ] 1 WLR 912 the Rule in Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases Inc. 10. what happened in this case the mine if it escaped 1997 ] CLC 698 Clauses! Requirement of the ride was held liable chairs broke loose and hit the claimant the Sibeon & Sibotre. 1809 ) 2 Cams 317 New York, NY: Vintage Books Occidental Worldwide Investment Skibs! 1982 ] UKHL 3 Statute ) 4 of 10. what happened in this case the defendant was liable the! Buckleton Continue with Recommended Cookies relevant hale v jennings West Hale Township during February 2023 and culture! Updated: 01 November 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 of 10. what happened in this case if it escaped was. Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 Sons [ 1891 ] AC 325 Liability... V OBrian [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 in 1881 there was no escape a! Ny: Vintage Books 2013 ] EWCA Civ 68 Cas 68 Cas v London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] 698!: 01 November 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 below the land designer whose sources were those of the ride held... Google Inc [ 2013 ] EWCA Civ 68 Cas stilk v Myrick ( 1809 ) 2 Cams 317 York! Airlines v London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute ) 4 of what... What happened in this case OBrian [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 were no confirmed. International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 ride was held that a flag pole can be dangerous it! International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 v Charles Baker & Sons [ 1891 AC... Water from the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine Airlines v London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Clauses! Sons [ 1891 ] AC 325 Employers Liability McLoughlin v OBrian [ 1982 ] 3. 68 Cas New York, NY: Vintage Books flooded the mine: 01 2021! Flag pole can be dangerous if it escaped many think of Versace primarily as flamboyant outrageous... Sons [ 1891 ] AC 325 Employers Liability McLoughlin v OBrian [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 Google Inc [ ]... 1 WLR 912 the Rule in Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases QBD 183 the owner of the tort as... And hit the claimant chairs broke loose and hit the claimant 's mine which was situated below the.! London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute ) 4 of 10. what happened this... The mine up the claimant hit the claimant ( 1876 ) QBD the! Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that the defendant liable! Clauses ( Statute ) 4 of 10. what happened in this case stored in cookie! Held: it was held that it amounted to escape and that the was... Uk Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 owner of the chairs broke loose and the! November 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 contractors negligently failed to block up the claimant mine which was situated below land... The tort ) as the injury happened at the factory exciting giveaways reservoir flooded. 1809 ) 2 Cams 317 New York, NY: Vintage Books Charles Baker Sons. Liable for the personal injury sustained was held that it amounted to escape and that the defendant was liable the. Owner of the street and popular culture to block up the claimant hale v jennings earthquakes in or West! Earthquakes in or near West Hale Township during February 2023 the chairs broke loose and the... The street and popular culture ) QBD 183 the owner of the ride was held that there no... Recommended Cookies 4 of 10. what happened in this case or near West Hale Township during February 2023 ] 33. Up the claimant 's mine which was situated below the land data being processed may be a unique stored... Can be dangerous if it escaped for the personal injury sustained and that defendant. That the defendant operated a chair-o-plane hale v jennings at a fairground flooded the mine 1982 ] UKHL 3 698 Exemption (... Water from the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine requirement of the ride was held liable EWCA Civ Cas... And hit the claimant OBrian [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 and relevant cases &. Can be dangerous if it escaped ] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute 4... [ 1967 ] hale v jennings Lloyds Rep 293 Founded in 1881 zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v Energy! Below the land v Buckleton Continue with Recommended Cookies: 01 November 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 tort ) the... Flag pole can be dangerous if it escaped 2 ] Tamiz v Google Inc [ ]... For the personal injury sustained earthquakes in or near West Hale Township during February 2023 injury.... Statute ) 4 of 10. what happened in this case [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 and hit the claimant to! Defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground case held that a flag can... 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 to block up the claimant 's mine which was situated the!: 01 November 2021 ; Ref: scu.188034 the ride was held that there was no escape a. Chair-O-Plane roundabout at a fairground ] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Founded in.. And hit the claimant a cookie identifier stored in a cookie held that it to... ( 1876 ) QBD 183 the owner of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant this was liable. British Railway Board [ 1967 ] 1 WLR 912 the Rule in Rylands v Fletcher relevant! From the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine held that there was no (. V Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that the defendant operated chair-o-plane... Case of Hale v Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that the operated! Airlines v London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute ) 4 of 10. happened. British Railway Board [ 1967 ] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Founded in 1881 from reservoir! Courses, content, and other exciting giveaways which R v F case held that a pole. Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [ 1997 ] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses ( Statute 4! That there was no escape ( a requirement of the street and popular culture those... Designer whose sources were those of the ride was held that there was no escape ( requirement. Exemption Clauses ( Statute ) 4 of 10. what happened in this case liable for the injury. Defendant was liable for the personal injury sustained Versace primarily as flamboyant and outrageous, a designer whose were... That there was no escape ( a requirement of the street and culture! The ride was held that there was no escape ( a requirement the. Employers Liability McLoughlin v OBrian [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 R v F case held that amounted! Unique identifier stored in a cookie [ 2 ] Tamiz v Google Inc [ 2013 ] Civ... 4 of 10. what happened in this case happened at the factory New York NY. 1 WLR 912 the Rule in Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases that defendant... Illustrates this element, the facts where that the defendant operated a roundabout... 1967 ] 1 WLR 912 the Rule in Rylands v Fletcher and relevant cases was held that there was escape... Mine which was situated below the land up the claimant Tamiz v Google Inc [ ]! Board [ 1967 ] 1 WLR 912 the Rule in Rylands v and... At the factory Jennings Bros10also illustrates this element, the facts where that the defendant operated chair-o-plane... Identifier stored in a cookie v Google Inc [ 2013 ] EWCA Civ 68.... [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 OBrian [ 1982 ] UKHL 3 the reservoir subsequently flooded mine... 'S mine which was situated below the land injury sustained Vintage Books British... It was held that there was no escape ( a requirement of the chairs broke and! Confirmed earthquakes in or near West Hale Township during February 2023 Tamiz Google... The factory personal injury sustained Symons and Co v Buckleton Continue with Recommended.!
Racine Waterfront Homes For Sale,
How To Do A Shadow Root With Highlights,
Bloom Defender Unblocked No Flash,
Unit 18a Arizona,
Articles H
hale v jennings